tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6370216509950704776.post3073160411090297611..comments2013-11-20T13:26:22.117-08:00Comments on Pro-35: Review- Kenda Nevegal 26 x 1.95Matthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00725440161482141778noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6370216509950704776.post-21318115688920674612012-02-23T19:32:25.596-08:002012-02-23T19:32:25.596-08:00On a Stan's 355 it was just shy of 2.0 inches ...On a Stan's 355 it was just shy of 2.0 inches at the widest part by my fairly rough measure. On a Crest it was about the same as that's just 2 mm wider internally. While the size wasn't visibly different between the two the ride quality was palpably better on the Crest when ridden back to back. It's not a high volume tire as it has a square casing so most of that extra rim width changes the sidewall shape to be slightly more bulbous. <br /><br />The Nevegal in the 2.1" size is appreciably wider and between 2.1" and 2.2" on a Crest. In that size the casing is a little more rounded than the 1.95.Matthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00725440161482141778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6370216509950704776.post-35609464750621231332012-02-23T10:54:40.435-08:002012-02-23T10:54:40.435-08:00Thanks for the review. What's the actual width...Thanks for the review. What's the actual width of the tire(at casing and knobs) when mounted? My 2.1s were more like 2.2, so I'm wondering if that's similar for the 1.95s. Also, what's your rim width? Thanks,DrHumblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00471755052528120992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6370216509950704776.post-79906048861952082442011-05-27T14:22:50.064-07:002011-05-27T14:22:50.064-07:00Nice review. Thanks.Nice review. Thanks.Michael Huanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07185232733127814923noreply@blogger.com